Narges Achikzei, who was set on fire, and her boyfriend had a heated conflict with the woman's 32-year-old former employer in Utrecht. The family is associated with fraudulent practices. In any case, they were accused by an aggrieved man. He himself was summoned to a court one week after the fire murder in connection with the slander. For a long time he is said to have sent e-mails to the woman - an ex-worker - and damaged her honour and good name.
It is very likely that this conflict played a role in the cruel death. The public prosecutor's office never wants to answer questions about the content of the legal conflict. It is clear that the conflict exerted great pressure on Achikzei and other participants.
In the case of honour killings, it is inevitable that statements are made with an emphasis on restoring 'honour'; that does not mean that all statements are true. We have put 200 contradictory statements about the Zeist fire murder in a diagram. Officially, the fire murder of Narges Achikzei is a murder without a motive, because judges have rejected the fabricated jealousy motive. On the basis of our investigation, this is a case of honour killing that corrupt Police Zeist has covered up.
Narges Achikzei is a victim of a love rival because everyone says so and because honour killing has been contradicted by her family and friends.
Narges Achikzei is a victim of honour killing because she did not want to marry the Afghan man the parents had chosen for her.
Narges Achikzei had major problems with her family and friends' legal extortion campaign against her former employer.
Narges Achikzei had planned an appointment with an anonymous Public Prosecutor to discuss her criminal case.
Honour killings are common among Afghan, Syrian, Turkish, Iraqi and Hindustani girls. They are rejected, mistreated or murdered by their families because they have damaged the good honour. The reason is often that girls have a relationship that is not approved by their parents or want to divorce. Read more about the horrible honour killing stories of 2018 or the honour killing stories of 2017.
Corrupt Dutch authorities chose jealousy as their motive. “Someone didn’t want Narges to get married. Aryan R. was hopelessly in love with Haroen Mehraban” lied Prosecutor of Justice Mr. Rob van Noort before the District Court in The Netherlands.
Officials of the narco state of the Netherlands swear in the media and before judges that there was no evidence of honour killing when the Afghan Narges Achikzei (23) was set on fire two weeks before her marriage and one week before her criminal trial. Read here all the testimonies that contradict the false statements of police and justice spokespersons.
Honor killings are always pre-announced, everyone in Narges Achikzei’s environment is aware that a dangerous game has been played with the freedom of choice of her spouse at stake. Narges was well aware of the risks. The timeline made in all honesty by her ex-boss Ralph Geissen is particularly painful for the corrupt and failing authorities who have no difficulty whatsoever in concealing 60+ declarations, an honor killing, human rights violations and probably many other violations which cannot bear the light of day. With blood on their hands notorious Dutch detectives swore in the media that there was absolutely no evidence for an honor killing and that the legal conflict of the women burned alive had nothing to do with Islam.In front of the judges, however, the Public Prosecutor remained silent about all the legal intricacies surrounding Narges Achikzei, because that story clearly did not fit in with their favourite fictional motive: a crime passionel committed by Aryan Rostai of her own free will because of her love for the infamous scammer/ extortionist Haroen Mehraban. Provenly dishonest Public Prosecutor Mr. Rob van Noort furthermore falsely accused the executor Aryan Rostai of not wanting to give any insight into her motivation for her horrific act and therefore pleaded on behalf of Narges Achikzei’ family for an extra severe sentence.