Twitter decides that our public accusation is not in conflict with Twitter rules
🎈🍾🎉🎉@Twitter judges that our banner with the text 'Authorities close eyes to corruption, scams, extortion, honour crimes' with which @politiezeistwst and @het_OM are accused of covering up a terrible honour killing and 60+ reports of internet scams, is not in violation of the Twitter rules.🥳 […]
The Justice and Security Inspectorate will use the information sent by R. Geissen for a risk analysis
For the time being, the Inspectorate for Justice and Security sees no reason to investigate R. Geissen's report about the police, because the Inspectorate has not found any signs that could indicate a structural problem in the investigation. However, the Inspectorate does include the information sent by Geissen in a risk analysis, which forms the basis for an annual work programme. […]
Decision of the Court of Central Netherlands concerning a challenge of the police judge G.A. Bos
At this hearing, the applicant requested that his criminal case be referred to the multiple criminal division and that data be requested from the ABN-AMRO bank. The police judge rejected the request for referral to the multiple chamber on the grounds that it had read the defendant's statement of defence and the criminal file correctly and did not consider referral necessary. […]
Criminal proceedings R. Geissen on account of libel, slander and insult before the police judge Mr. G.A. Bos
According to Geissen, there is much more to this case than meets the eye. Dozens of reports have been made, which are now being set aside. Geissen asked the police judge to request information from the ABN-AMRO bank. If this shows that MDNDR010 is right, then Geissen can be convicted. If she is not right, then they are corrupt and have to be removed from the police. […]
Notification that police chief MDNDR011 has joined as an aggrieved party and is claiming € 150.00 for defamation
The Utrecht Police drew up an official report against Geissen for committing defamation by means of distribution, exhibition, assault, performance (SR 262/1SR 261/2) on 11 January 2017 in Utrecht. The next injured party has joined a claim for damages: Mr. MDNDR011. The amount of the claim amounts to € 150.00.[…]
Public Prosecutor’s Office sues R. Geissen for libel, slander and insult to MDNDR010 and MDNDR011
Geissen is charged with deliberately attacking the honour and/or reputation of a civil servant named MDNDR010, chief agent in Baart on 11 January 2017 during and/or in connection with the lawful performance of her ministry, by discharging a certain fact, with the apparent aim of publicising it, circulated by means of writings or images, publicly exhibited or attached to it, after all Geissen has placed a film on Youtube. […]
Invitation of the police to R. Geissen for arrest and questioning in connection with insulting an in-office civil servant
Unit Central Netherlands, District Criminal Investigation Department Flevoland requests Geissen to appear on 15 November 2017, at 11:00 a.m., at police station Baljuwstraat 2, 1315HG in Almere, where he will be arrested and interrogated as a suspect with regard to insulting a civil servant during or with regard to the lawful performance of his ministry, Article 266 paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 267 paragraph 2 of the Penal Code. […]
Broadcasting Corporation is not going to broadcast the episode about the fire murder in Zeist from the series “The Family Detective”
Dear Mr Geissen,Thank you for your messages regarding our series ‘The Family Investigator’. We can inform you that the case you are talking about, ‘the fire murder in Zeist’, is not part of the episodes we are going to broadcast. I hope that I have informed you sufficiently. Yours sincerely, Michiel van Rijswijk Communication| Communication consultant BNNVARA Visit: Wim T. Schippersplein 3 […]
The Public Prosecutor’s Office rejects all requests from R. Geissen and does not wish to respond substantively to all accusations
The Public Prosecution Service concludes from Geissen's reports that he has filed a complaint with the Dutch Press Council about a journalist. He states that the outcome of the complaint procedure with the Dutch Press Council can be very negative for the police (more specifically the police in Zeist) and the Public Prosecution Service. Geissen states that the murder of Mrs. N. Achikzei was not the work of one person, but that there was a group of perpetrators and an honour killing. […]
Request by R. Geissen to the Public Prosecutor’s Office to inspect the criminal file relating to the murder of N. Achikzei
Court of Utrecht, Vrouwe Justitiaplein 1 3511 EX Utrecht About: Request for access to the criminal file of executor MDNDR021 16/712372-09 Dear employee victim care A. van Doorn, On behalf of myself and my bankrupt company Advios Assurantiën BV I appeal to article 51d of the Dutch Code of Criminal Procedure and as victim/injured party I request copies of judicial documents belonging to the criminal proceedings […]
Public Prosecutor Mr. Rob van Noort gives his opinion on the fire murder in Zeist at RTV Utrecht
It's hard to imagine that MDNDR021 did this alone. Did she ring the bell herself? How did she flee? Someone didn't want Narges to get married! MDNDR021 killed Narges because she was hopelessly in love with Haroen Mehraban according to the Public Prosecutor Mr. Rob van Noort. […]
Court sentences MDNDR021 to 12 years imprisonment and compulsory hospitalisation in the case of the fire murder
His girlfriend Narges Achikzei told him that someone had called to say that there was a package. She then went downstairs. A little later she went back upstairs, while they are (again) on the phone together. Suddenly he heard screaming on the phone. The person reporting the incident hears the man say: "Something terrible has happened" and "They have set my girlfriend on fire. Oh, God." […]
Anonymous Prosecutor informs R. Geissen that he will not (any longer) prosecute him on probation
The public prosecutor in the district of Utrecht considering that Ralph Geissen, born on 13 April 1977 in Utrecht, is suspected of libel/laster and stalking committed in or around the period from 1 May 2008 to 1 January 2011 in Utrecht and/or Zeist. Notifies that he, Public Prosecutor, will not prosecute Geissen with respect to this offence(s) on the condition: that he will not misbehave during a probationary period of 2 years. […]
The Public Prosecution Service does not want to respond to R. Geissen’s complaint about the performance of MDNDR010 and MDNDR011
From your letters and the enclosed appendices, I do not deduce any concrete clues, which could be a reason to call in the National Criminal Investigation Department for such a fact-finding investigation. In your letter, you also express the hope that a fact-finding investigation will subsequently ensure that the Public Prosecution Service will refrain from criminal prosecution in the case in which you are a suspect. […]
Defence R. Geissen in criminal proceedings of the Public Prosecution Service on behalf of N. Achikzei, Z. Mehraban and Mr. P.H. Ruijzendaal
Dear Judges, I hereby send you my defence in triplicate, one copy for the court, one copy for the Public Prosecutor's Office and one copy for the person making the declaration. I have indicated to the examining magistrate that I find it very annoying to be regarded as a suspect in a case in which the notifier, in the run-up to this dubious criminal case, was brutally murdered in view of the risk that this criminal case could lead a life of its own in the media. […]
MDNDR011 does not want to request identifying data of N. Mehraban from ABN AMRO
Requesting identification data from a bank account can be done within the framework of a criminal investigation and is done by an investigating officer. The investigation in the context of your criminal case has now been closed, in view of the date of the hearing you mentioned, which is why I am unable to honour your request. Renewed investigation activities, including the retrieval of identifying information, can now be requested at the hearing. […]
Sometimes public and media pressure increases the chance of tunnel vision, says police officer Harro Kras
As an example, he mentions the investigation into the murder of a 23-year-old Afghan woman from Zeist. She died in December 2009 after she was set on fire. "The media were on top of it. Experts stood in line to give their views on this so-called honour killings. […]
Police officer MDNDR010 has filed a complaint against R. Geissen on account of Defamation (in writing)
On the site https://www.expiratieweb.nl/narges/oplossing-zeister-brandmoord.htm, there are two pieces. Solution fire murder case narges achikzei and another article about the same case. In the above-mentioned case a colleague of mine is severely damaged. My colleague has also filed a complaint about defamation. I understand from you that Mr. Ralph Giessen was the former administrator/owner of the aforementioned site […]
No substantive response from police management to R. Geissen’s complaint about the corrupt police action
08-146199: This is not a declaration but a mutation. This means that what he reported is known to the police, but this does not lead to a criminal prosecution. 09-192579: This is a report of which the public prosecutor has taken the decision not to investigate/prosecute it under criminal law. Geissen has been informed of this in writing by the Public Prosecution Service. 2010247778: This is a report. The Public Prosecutor will check whether it will be dealt with. […]
Invitation from J. van de Kraats to R. Geissen for police questioning on libel
Subject: Invitation to interview Zeist, 27 January 2011 Dear sir, I hereby invite you for questioning in order to be present at 10.00 a.m. on Thursday, February 3, 2011. appear at the police station in Zeist, Utrechtseweg 141. You will be heard about libel (in writing). I would like to draw your attention to the fact that you can consult a lawyer at your own expense. […]
Mark Lauriks denies Narges Achikzei on behalf of the Ministry of Justice
Afghan, then. Many cases are called 'honour killing', but they are not at all. I know that case a little bit. I am not easily saddened by heavy criminal cases anymore, but this is a very gruesome end. I have researched 2 real honour killings (murder), but these are really rare occurrences... And honour killings are not Islam either, also a misunderstanding […]
Judgment of the Utrecht District Court Z. Mehraban and P.H. Ruijzendaal versus R. Geissen
3.1. prohibits the defendant from sending e-mails, publishing articles on the internet and making statements to third parties with immediate effect, in which he accuses the plaintiffs of crimes and causes damage; 3.2. orders the defendant, within one week after service of this judgment, to remove (or cause to be removed) the messages and images about and from plaintiffs already published by (or on behalf of) him on various internet forums and websites […]
Report of R. Geissen against Z. Mehraban and Mr. P.H. Ruijzendaal for murder at Utrecht police station
Between Tuesday 1 January 2008 at 00.00 hours and Wednesday 13 October 2010 at 00.00 hours, the offence referred to in the introduction was committed on Laan van Vollenhove 2175, 3706 GW, Zeist. I report fraud, threats, defamation/libel, false declarations, extortion/threat, harassment, consecration of informal Muslim marriage, complicity in murder. […]
Police team leader Tijn Keuss denies Narges Achikzei on behalf of Police Utrecht and the Public Prosecution Service.
For the time being, it seems that there was jealousy because Narges was to get married shortly afterwards and because Narges led a very happy life and we are looking for the motive in that line. In the media it is suggested that Narges is the victim of honour killing. A completely unjustified suggestion. There is simply no question of honour killings. […]
Minister of Justice does not want to answer the parliamentary question as to whether Narges Achikzei is the victim of honour killing
Honour-related violence is a possibility that the police and the Public Prosecution Service take into account. In the interest of this investigation, I am not in a position to make any further announcements at this time. At the moment, I am not in a position to comment on the Islamic marriage, as the criminal investigation is ongoing in this case. […]
Police Zeist investigates the murder of N. Achikzei and asks the public for information about the motive
Murder of Narges Achikzei Zeist, Monday afternoon 7 December 2009, 23-year-old Narges Achikzei from Zeist on the 12th floor in the Geroflat is most likely deliberately set on fire by a woman. The apartment is located on the Laan van Vollenhove and the student Narges lived here on the 12th floor. She was poured over with a flammable liquid […]
The prosecution informs R. Geissen through the media that they are continuing N. Achikzei’s slander case against him
The criminal case against 32-year-old R.G. from Utrecht for stalking via e-mail and slander against 23-year-old Narges Achikzei has been postponed. The case was on the roll for tomorrow. The young woman from Zeist was killed on Monday because she was set on fire. A connection between these two cases is being investigated by the detective team, just like all other possible motives. […]
Anonymous police detective: 'Woman victim of honour killings and because of extortion of a company'
At Radio M Utrecht a detective involved in TGO Gero said: "Woman victim of honour killing and because of extortion of a company". This quote is known to De Telegraaf because of the url of their news article 'woman-victim-honour-killing.html' and also Elsevier concluded on this day "Honour killing in Zeist: 23-year-old Afghan woman set on fire". […]
Police and the DA won't answer questions because the case is under investigation
Police are taking honour killings into account. The victim would get married. The marriage would have taken place according to islamic laws earlier. This explains the unmarried cohabitation. The woman who was set on fire had been at odds with her former employer for months. Her sister, friend and lawyer were also accused by the man of fraud and threats in numerous publications. […]
Invitation from the Public Prosecution to N. Achikzei and Mr. P.H. Ruijzendaal to discuss their slander case
Dear Mr Ruijzendaal, dear Mrs Achikzei, You’ve asked for a meeting with the attending prosecutor about the criminal case with the above parquet number. To this end, I invite you on Thursday 10 December next at 16.00 on the District Public Prosecutor’s Office. Enq. room 14. Would you like to report to the doorman? The Public Prosecutor, […]
R. Geissen complains to Zeist police about the actions of MDNDR010 and MDNDR011 in the Mehraban affair
It’s time for Police Zeist to put an end to the scams and extortion practices of N. Achikzei, S. Achikzei, A. Achikzei, H. Mehraban and their lawyer P.H. Ruijzendaal. In the past, Narges Achikzei presented herself to me as Narges Mehraban, the print screen below says it all. […]
Report of Mr. P.H. Ruijzendaal for insult against R. Geissen at police station Zeist
Despite a conviction in summary proceedings by the President of the District Court of Utrecht with a penalty payment, this person still continues to insult and distribute libel statements. See case number: 266472/KG ZA 09-426 I give the police copies of the most annoying and recently published libel statements for further investigation. To copy all libel statements is too much. […]
Report of Z. Mehraban and N. Achikzei against R. Geissen for defamation made at Zeist police station
Under case number 08-365181, my girlfriend, Narges Achikzei, has already reported libel or defamation against the suspect mentioned in this case. I can tell you that defamation and libel begin to take on serious and threatening forms. I am therefore afraid that someone unknown to me will do something to me or my family. […]
Subpoena R. Geissen due to stalking by email, insulting and libelous statement
1. he has, at one or more times in or around the period from 1 May 2008 to and by 31 December 2008 at Zeist and/or Utrecht, in any case in the Netherlands, unlawfully and systematically and intentionally infringed the personal life atmosphere of N. Achikzei, at least of another, with the the aim of forcing Achikzei, or at least the other person, to do something, not to or to tolerate and/or to frighten, after all, the accused has then been there intentionally and with great regularity – who approaches Achikzei by email; […]
MDNDR011 refrains from investigating N. Achikzei, Z. Mehraban and Mr. P.H. Ruijzendaal
Dear sir, On 23 June 2009, you reported several criminal offences in Zeist that were committed against you or your company by a former employee and a former trainee and some of their family members during the period January 2008 – June 2009. Shortly after the declaration was recorded, I assessed it and decided to give it a low priority; as a result, in fact, no/little follow-up investigation is carried out in the declaration. […]
R. Geissen and Advios declared bankrupt at the request of N. Achikzei, Z. Mehraban and Mr. P.H. Ruijzendaal
Cause of the bankruptcy According to the managing director of the bankrupt company, the bankruptcy is due to a conflict with two former employees of the bankrupt company. This conflict has escalated completely, with, among other things, criminal declarations being made on both sides. […]
Report of R. Geissen against Z. Mehraban and N. Achikzei for fraud at Zeist police.
Advios Assurantiën BV, represented by Ralph Geissen, reports threats, making a false declaration, libel/defamation, attempted fraud, scams and extortion against former employee Narges Achikzei, her husband Haroen Mehraban, former intern Sahar Achikzei, their father Abdul Achikzei and their counselor Peter Hans Ruijzendaal. […]
Utrecht District Court ruled in favour of R. Geissen: his report was wrongly refused by the Utrecht police
Dear Mr. Geissen, I have been informed of your complaint about filing a declaration via the District Public Prosecutor’s Office in Utrecht. I would like to give you the opportunity to file a declaration and therefore I ask you to contact me to make an appointment. With kind regards, Hans Hameeteman […]
Judgment Mr. P.H. Ruijzendaal against Advios Assurantiën BV and R. Geissen for libel, slander and insult.
On the site yelloyello.com Geissen posted the following text on 12 January 2009: "Mr. P.H. Ruijzendaal is accused of being a lawyer who has been extorting companies on behalf of a Muslim fundamentalist criminal organisation. The Utrecht Criminal Investigation Department is currently investigating the case, so formally Mr. P.H. Ruijzendaal is "a suspect" of complicity in attempted swindling and extortion." […]
Reaction of the Utrecht Police to R. Geissen’s complaint about the police action of MDNDR010
Part of the complaint that you have submitted relates to a matter that will be dealt with and assessed in criminal proceedings. The handling of that part of your complaint according to the Utrecht Police Complaints Procedure leads to an undesirable concurrence with the criminal proceedings, because it is up to the Public Prosecutor’s Office and the court to decide on a criminal offence. In the first instance, your defence should therefore be included in the criminal proceedings. […]
Judgment N. Achikzei, Z. Mehraban, S. Achikzei against Advios Assurantiën BV and Geissen on account of a wage claim, defamation, slander and insulting behaviour
4.4. Furthermore, Geissen argues that, by e-mail dated 7 May 2008, which – if he did not do so – was was sent via Achikzei’s business computer, a death threat to Zaman. Mehraban, plaintiff sub 2, has received. Geissen filed a declaration to that effect on 14 May 2008. in the police force. Leaving aside the question of whether this would justify his behaviour, it is clear from the text of the e-mail of 7 May 2008 submitted by Geissen not of any death threat to Geisses. In addition, Geissen has also failed to demonstrate that he has reported the matter to the police. […]
MDNDR010 of police Zeist is investigating the report of N. Achikzei
During the interrogation it appeared to us that the defendant, despite his co-directorhip of a financial consultancy firm, could possibly have tunnel vision with regard to the declarant. Possibly that the accused confused reality and fiction with regard to the notifier From statements of the accused and announcements of the declarant the motive for the behaviour of the accused could have been that the accused would have liked to marry the declarant himself. […]
Victim of scammer N. Mehraban shares her new address details with R. Geissen
Ralph, Since 19-06-2008: Laan van Vollenhove 2175 in Zeist. greetings Dear Hans, Her date of birth, registered in the Netherlands, is 18-09-1986 (see salary slip under the dismissal letter: link). Haroen Mehraban comes from Leeuwarden, now they probably live together in Zeist, probably on the Laan van Vollenhove. […]
Report of N. Achikzei against R. Geissen for defamation at police Zeist
I'm filing for libel and defamation. My honor/good name has been attacked by the defendant because my name and that of my fiancée have been damaged via email and on sites of the internet. The accused had the apparent aim to make this public. Since 1 June 2007 until 7 May 2008 I have been working for the company Advios.[…]
A minimum of seven charges against Mr. and Mrs. N. Mehraban for internet fraud
(on site about internet scams): Re: Scammed by N. Mehraban Account number 47.86.32.320 Watchman requested the date of birth of Narges ACHIKZEI from Geissen on 22 December 2008, 2:04 p.m. by e-mail in order to make sure that she is the right person and he has retrieved the current home address of "Mr. / Mrs." Mehraban: Since 19/06/2008: Laan van Vollenhove 2175 in Zeist[…]
Mutation of Z. Mehraban and N. Achikzei against R. Geissen because of stalking by email at police Zeist
The frequency of emailing varies from 1 per week to 30 per day. BE Achikzei and BE Mehraban discussed the situation with family members of Mister Geissen when they came to pick up the office supplies at BE Achikzei. BE Mehraban tried to talk to Mister Geissen and asked him to stop mailing and told him that he had nothing to do with a death threat that would have been done. The reaction of mister Geissen was that he wanted to marry Achikzei in 4 months. […]
Judgment in absentia of the Utrecht District Court on account of the labour dispute between N. Achikzei and Advios Assurantiën BV
orders the defendant to pay the plaintiff against proof of discharge:1. € 1,700.00 gross in respect of the salary for the month of May 2008;2. € 1,632.00 gross in respect of unpaid holiday pay; 3. € 567.00 gross in respect of unpaid holidays days;4. the statutory increase pursuant to Section 7:625 of the Dutch Civil Code of 50% on the amounts allocated under 1. up to and including 3. above;5. the statutory interest rate on the amounts allotted under 1. up to and including 4. as from 1 June 2008 up to the date of payment; […]
Message from R. Geissen against N. Achikzei because of threat at police station Utrecht-Noord
1.time 2.where 3.facts 4.consequences 5.measure 1. Between/on: On Wednesday 14 May 2008, around 14:00 hrs. 2. Police Station Utrecht North 3. BE Geissen feels threatened by e-mails from BE Achikzei. The mails are attached. They are not criminal/factual threats. 4. Mails have been handed over, after consultation with service no declaration was recorded, only reported. 5. Recorded for info. […]